• Home
  • Posts RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • Edit
Blue Orange Green Pink Purple

Still under construction ;)

-------------------------------------

Digital Communications: The Two Faces of Facebook - Advertising Age - Steve Rubel

The Two Faces of Facebook

Steve Rubel on Digital Communications

By Steve Rubel
Published: October 29, 2009


I spend a lot of time gazing into a crystal ball that I know is going to be cloudy half the time. Lately I have been pondering Facebook's future.

Facebook is clearly on a roll and is knocking on Google's door as the biggest site on the web. Will it continue to dominate or see its lead slip? Here are two potential outcomes.

The Google Scenario: In the more rosy picture, Facebook remains the disrupter. It transforms how we use the web.

Just as search changed our expectations that everything we want to know is accessible if we Google it, Facebook is the inverse. If information is important, it will find us through our friends and their friends and so on. We don't have to Google it.

"Trends from friends" is as transformative as search. The more we use Facebook and the more we create and connect there, the smarter it gets in realizing what we need and when. We don't have to ask.

The opportunity cost of switching to an alternative is simply too great. This is why millions remain with the same IM network they first tried years ago.

Facebook, like Google, groks data. And they know how to study and use it to make the experience and value grow with every status update, photo, connection and interaction. Once they get serious about search -- and consumers see the value in using it for finding curated information -- Facebook's value and power could grow.

The AOL Scenario: It's hard to believe but 10 years ago AOL was once dominant. It was a hit with advertisers.

Publishers paid for position and built grand palaces. It was the place to be. It was also a walled garden. Sound familliar? This begs the question: Could Facebook follow the same path? Possibly.

Through continuous innovation Facebook is trying not to become AOL. That's the smart play. However, each successive update has irked consumers. The revamped news feed, which rolled out last week, is just the latest.

So far we keep coming back; but you have to wonder if a social network has nine lives. It's possible fickle consumers will eventually migrate elsewhere.

Where might they turn? Just as with AOL they'll go everywhere. The entire web is becoming social. Facebook Connect is a play to make this happen on their terms. However this is where Google, Yahoo and other stalwarts could shine. They already control millions of IM and email address books and have lots of data.

So which mask will Facebook don -- Google's or AOL's? My bet right now is Google's.


Source: Advertising Age

Read More View Comments | Posted by Fotis edit post

Ladbrokes not planning 888 bid - sources

Reuters Group LimitedImage via Wikipedia







LONDON, Oct 6 (Reuters) - British bookmaker Ladbrokes (LAD.L) has no current plans to bid for online rival 888 (888.L), sources familiar with the situation told Reuters.

A report in the Daily Mail newspaper on Tuesday cited market speculation of an imminent bid by Ladbrokes of 139 pence a share, valuing the business at around 480 million pounds ($764 million).

However, sources told Reuters no approach had been made and there was no prospect of one in the immediate future.

"It's rubbish. These are old rumours doing the rounds again," said one of the sources.

Ladbrokes and 888 declined to comment on the speculation.

(Reporting by Matt Scuffham; Editing by Victoria Bryan) ($1=.6279 Pound)

Source: Reuters



Related articles by Zemanta
  • Bookies face dip in profits amid football season with 'not enough draws' (telegraph.co.uk)
  • Bookies Cite News of Injury For Rush of Bets on Match (nytimes.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Read More View Comments | Posted by Fotis edit post

Social Media and Content Discovery: A Growing Relationship

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009 by Frank Reed


WP Greet Box icon
X
Hello fellow Twitter user! Don't forget to Twit this post if you like it, or follow Andy Beal on Twitter if you find this blog interesting.
While the commercial Internet age is in its teens according to linear age it has some difficulty focusing. Just when users are getting used to a world that is search engine centric there comes along the social web or social media or social networking or social (insert your word here) to truly change how people make sense of the sheer volume of data on the Internet. This change or movement toward the social web is happening at an ever increasing rate and creates opportunities as well as difficulties for those who are trying to harness this power for business.
 
Nielsen reports at its blog in a post from Jon Gibbs, VP Media Analytics:

Social Media Collage




In the beginning there were ISPs, which then gave way to portals ― aggregators of content and links ― which then led to the rise of “search” as the dominant form of Internet navigation or, how we get to where we we’re going on the web. However, as with most forms of evolution, change is constant, and over the past two years search navigation has appeared to shift to social media.
We continue to see that social media has not only changed the way consumers communicate and gather on the Web, but also impacted content discovery and navigation in a big way. But how? Is social media taking the place of portals and search as the hub of online navigation?
Nielsen goes on to categorize people as either ‘searchers’ who primarily get their data from search engines, ‘portalists’ who use a portal site to access data and ‘socializers’ who use, you guessed it, social media to get their information. As this last group grows there could be some significant implications moving forward for everyone who is using the Internet for business.

JPEG Start Search
As a result the socializer group actually feels that there is too much information on the Internet. Much more so than those who simply use search engines. Think about it. A search engine user takes it on faith (the vast majority of the time) that the entire Internet for a keyword or key phrase is boiled down to just 10 best results. Of course, if they only take their online sophistication that far then the Internet does appear to be easy to manage. Socializers, on the other hand, spend a lot more time online and hear / see a lot more than regular Internet users. It can become very noisy very quickly.

So how do they manage this? Through their online social network of buddies, of course. At this point, now the real recommendations and buying decisions are happening based on what other people, not an impersonal engine says. Hopefully, they are giving actual experience to help their online connections make more informed purchasing decisions. That’s the theory at least. Take a look at the significant differences in how socializers and searchers use various formats for information. Why Wikipedia is even part of the discussion baffles me but what do I know?

JPEG trustedsource1
So what are you? Searcher? Portalist? Socializer? A little of all of them. Will social media displace search engines as a primary source of information in the near future? What does it mean to you TODAY as an Internet marketer? Share your thoughts and let’s learn from each other.



Related articles by Zemanta
  • Digital influence 501: What are the next trends and hot cases in social media (slideshare.net)
  • Is Twitter losing steam? (medicineandtechnology.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Read More View Comments | Posted by Fotis edit post
is sprucing up his blog. And about time it was.
Read More View Comments | Posted by Fotis edit post

Online Measurement: 16% of the Web Clicking Display Ads - Advertising Age - Digital

But ComScore, Starcom Study Shows Banners Are Still Effective -- Especially When Paired With Paid Search

by Kunur Patel
Published: September 30, 2009


NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- The number of people online who click display ads has dropped 50% in less than two years, and only 8% of internet users account for 85% of all clicks, according to the most recent "Natural Born Clickers" study from ComScore and media agency Starcom. As the pool of people who click on banner ads rapidly decreases, it begs the question: Is the long-used click-through rate now officially useless?........


Source: http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=139367




Related articles by Zemanta
  • Are Banner Ads Dying? (marketingpilgrim.com)
  • Display ads - Does a dropping CTR equal a drop in ROI? (cheezedmg.com)
  • Out of all ad formats, display ignored the most (thisisherd.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Read More View Comments | Posted by Fotis edit post
60% of U.S. adults don't want to be shown ads based on their interests

Sept 30, 2009

- Brian Morrissey

NEW YORK It has long been an article of faith among advertisers that consumers want more relevant advertising. Yet a new academic report finds that most Americans are opposed to marketers tracking them to tailor ad messages.

The study, compiled by researchers at the Universities of California and Pennsylvania, found 60 percent of U.S. adults don't want to be shown ads based on their interests.

When researchers explained the most common methods used for tailoring ads, the rejection rate climbed to between 73 percent and 80 percent, according to the study.

The findings give ammunition to privacy groups pressing Congress to enact stricter laws around Web tracking, particularly behavioral targeting. The Internet advertising industry has fought the efforts, pushing instead for a continuance of self-regulation and greater transparency of the methods used. The study would appear to have added weight coming from sources without an obvious predisposition in the often-bitter dispute over privacy practices.

The study's findings run counter to many articles of faith of the industry's defense of its targeting practices. For instance, consumer unease with targeting increases when they know the methods used, across demographics, including the young. Internet advertisers often stress that cookie-based tracking is done anonymously, yet the study found 68 percent of respondents reject that. More than two-thirds of people said legislation should give them the right to see the information Web sites have about them.

The survey was conducted via phone from a national sample of 1,000 Web users in order to determine on which side of the Internet privacy debate consumers fall.

"Our findings suggest that if Americans could vote on behavioral targeting, they would shut it down," the study's authors conclude.

The report found most people are misinformed about current privacy laws. For instance, most believe there are laws prohibiting the sale of online data.

The researchers recommend several actions, including giving consumers the "substantive right to reject behavioral targeting" and "encourage transparency and retention limits in marketers' actions and consumers' ability to exercise control over the data companies collect about them."
Related articles by Zemanta
  • Survey: U.S. residents don't want targeted ads (macworld.com)
  • Ads Follow Web Users, and Get More Personal (nytimes.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Read More View Comments | Posted by Fotis edit post
Newer Posts Older Posts Home

The Affiliate Post

  • What is this?
      This is collection of my thoughts and of all the interesting things I come across while surfing.
  • AddThis


    Bookmark and Share

    Blogger Widget from Evri

    Content recommendations from Evri

    Fotis' shared items

    Labels

    • Facebook (7)
    • Google (7)
    • Twitter (6)
    • Social media (4)
    • Web search engine (4)
    • Web Design and Development (3)
    • YouTube (3)
    • Advertising (2)
    • Business (2)
    • Digg (2)
    • Internet marketing (2)
    • Microsoft (2)
    • Promotion (2)
    • Search (2)
    • Search Engines (2)
    • Search engine optimization (2)
    • Social network (2)
    • Website (2)
    • Yahoo (2)
    • AOL (1)
    • Affiliate marketing (1)
    • Andy Beal (1)
    • Apple (1)
    • Authoring (1)
    • BehavioralTargeting (1)
    • Bing (1)
    • Bookmaker (1)
    • British people (1)
    • CBS (1)
    • CNET Networks (1)
    • Cisco Systems (1)
    • Click-through rate (1)
    • ComScore (1)
    • Common Craft (1)
    • Daily Mail (1)
    • Fuze Box (1)
    • Google Browser Size (1)
    • Google Labs (1)
    • HTML (1)
    • IKEA (1)
    • Internet privacy (1)
    • Internet service provider (1)
    • Jack Dorsey (1)
    • John Mackey (1)
    • Ladbrokes (1)
    • London (1)
    • Malmö (1)
    • Money (1)
    • MySpace (1)
    • Newspaper (1)
    • Online Communities (1)
    • Online advertising (1)
    • Patrick Moran (1)
    • Pay-Per-Click Advertising (1)
    • Pennsylvania (1)
    • Privacy (1)
    • Security (1)
    • Shawn Collins (1)
    • Simon Cowell (1)
    • Social network service (1)
    • Software as a service (1)
    • Steve Jobs (1)
    • Store manager (1)
    • Sweden (1)
    • Television (1)
    • Uniform Resource Locator (1)
    • United States (1)
    • Viacom (1)
    • Victoria (1)
    • Web banner (1)
    • WebEx (1)
    • Webmaster Resources (1)
    • iPhone (1)
    • search-engine (1)

    Blog Archive

    • ► 2011 (1)
      • ► January (1)
    • ► 2010 (8)
      • ► July (1)
      • ► June (2)
      • ► April (1)
      • ► January (4)
    • ▼ 2009 (15)
      • ► December (6)
      • ► November (3)
      • ▼ October (6)
        • Digital Communications: The Two Faces of Facebook ...
        • Ladbrokes not planning 888 bid - sources
        • Social Media and Content Discovery: A Growing Rela...
        • is sprucing up his blog. And about time it was.
        • Online Measurement: 16% of the Web Clicking Displa...
        • 60% of U.S. adults don't want to be shown ads base...
    • ► 2007 (1)
      • ► February (1)
    • ► 2006 (1)
      • ► September (1)
  • Search






    • Home
    • Posts RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • Edit

    © Copyright The Affiliate Post . All rights reserved. | Blog Skins Designed by FTL Wordpress Themes

    Back to Top